Mr K Jarrett V Aberdeen City Council: 4115871/2014 - Gov.uk

Top London & UK & Ireland & Scotland & Wales Weed From

Mr K Jarrett V Aberdeen City Council: 4115871/2014 - Gov.uk. Read the full decision in mr d mcghee v aberdeen city council: Mr d mcghee claimant represented by mr c howie 15 solicitor aberdeen city council respondent represented by 20 mr c donald solicitor judgment of the employment tribunal 25 the claimant’s application to amend his claim is refused.

Unlawful deduction from wages, working time regulations. M2 3hz for the respondent. 4115814/2014 mr r chamberlain claimant aberdeen city council respondents judgment the claim is struck out under rule 37 of the rules contained in schedule 1 of the employment tribunals (constitution and rules of procedure) regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d). Se10 8ja ms annette gumbs (of counsel) instructed by: Defenders _____ aberdeen, 19 th october 2009. Mr robert mundy (of counsel) instructed by: I considered them, and, after hearing mr mundy's response for the council, indicated that i refused the applications and would give my reasons as part of this judgment. Ferguson v ardrossan dry dock co, 1910 sc 178; It was submitted that if the court were to apply an objective test to the evidence, it would not determine that jm was. In gloag on contract (2nd ed) at 627 reference is made to a number of cases where the equitable nature of retention is recognized;

Sheriffdom of grampian, highland and islands at aberdeen. 4115963/2014 mr k spence claimant aberdeen city council respondents judgment the claim is struck out under rule 37 of the rules contained in schedule 1 of the employment tribunals (constitution and rules of procedure) regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d). M2 3hz for the respondent. I considered them, and, after hearing mr mundy's response for the council, indicated that i refused the applications and would give my reasons as part of this judgment. In this summary application the pursuer craves reversal of the decision by the aberdeen city council licensing committee to refuse the pursuer's application to them for renewal of a taxi driver's licence. Read the full decision in mr k jarrett v aberdeen city. 4115812/2014 mr s cairney claimant aberdeen city council respondents judgment the claim is struck out under rule 37 of the rules contained in schedule 1 of the employment tribunals (constitution and rules of procedure) regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d). The aim of the shared risk assessment process is to focus scrutiny activity where it is most needed and to. Schedule 1 to the civic government (scotland) act 1982 sets out procedural rules in respect of. Mr mclean for the pursuer submitted that the averments in article 4, read as a whole, were sufficient to give rise to a foreseeable risk of injury to persons such as the pursuer from thomson's continued presence in the school. His behavioural history must be known to the defenders who had responsibility for his education both while he was at carden school and.